>I once had one of the Maynard devices you mention. It worked VERY reliably,
>even under Win95 with Seagate Backup Executive. Unfortunately, it
>is limited in
>capacity to 5GB per 112 meter tape with software compression. The
>drive is very
>slow with software compression, however, as the overhead drops the rate down
>below the streaming rate of common inexpensive SCSI adapters.
When I got it, it's capacity of 2.5gig uncompressed was still
a pretty substantial drive, especially compared to the Colorado 120's
and 250's that were popular at the time. Not to mention that most
people were still trying to break the IDE 540meg barrier. The other
reason I bought it was because it was cheap surplus and I decided to
take a chance on being able to get it fixed. I did toy with the idea
of using it under Win95/98 for a bit but decided that since the OS
had to be reinstalled to do a restore anyway that it wasn't worth the
hassle.
Jeff
--
Collector of Classic Microcomputers and Video Game Systems:
Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
Received on Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:55:38 BST