IBM AS/400(?) in Denver, CO

From: Eric Dittman <dittman_at_dittman.net>
Date: Wed Jul 11 19:30:52 2001

> Actually, I don't think a movement switch would be needed with
> mainframe's given that they aren't likely to be moved without a great
> deal of disassembly. The AS/400 comes in a numbef of different sizes
> (our AS/400 is pretty small while our AS/400e is roughly 3-4 times
> it's size). I've heard mention before concerning such a switch with
> them though. If that's the case, and I were stuck with one, it'd
> definately be time to find another OS to run on the thing! It would
> seem plenty of surplus AS/400's may be headed to the scrap heap
> because nobody can afford the licensing....that ranks up there with
> MS and thier new subscription-only software ideas...

One drawback with the AS/400 systems is there is no alternative
OS for the CISC systems (which is what you usually see selling
cheap or being scrapped).

The CISC AS/400 systems also can't run the newer releases of
the operating system.
-- 
Eric Dittman
dittman_at_dittman.net
Received on Wed Jul 11 2001 - 19:30:52 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:51 BST