Ethernet -- thicknet and thinnet before 10BaseT

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Fri Jul 27 02:17:08 2001

On Jul 26, 19:31, Bill Pechter wrote:
> > Several transceivers connected to the same cable allow several machines
> > to communicate. In a sense, the transceivers together with the coax
cable
> > form the hub.
> >
> > The T-pieces are, indeed passive (all 3 connectors connected in
parallel
> > in the obvious way), but they're not really the hub.
> >
> > -tony
>
> It's really that the hub doesn't exist on a bus network like 10Base2
> or 10Base5... all the Tee connectors are doing is replacing
> the vampire tap on thicknet...

> The thinnet "Transceiver" is really built on to the card on
> most PC's and is the same (basically) as the old thicknet
> transceiver attached to my Sun my Unix boxes -- they can go from
> Thinnet to Thicknet by swapping the N-Connector top to the
> BNC connector top. And thinnet can go to thicknet with just an N to BNC
> adapter -- but the max length and specs drop to thinnet specs.
>
> Hubs really distort the logical ethernet bus topology.

Not really. Logically, the innards of the hub are the bus. The ports are
the taps. Then, since the stations connected are typically some distance
away, you use an appropriate technology to get the cable to them, and
that's why there are additional transceivers (one on the host card, one on
the hub port) to drive the signal over a resonable distance. It certainly
changes the physical layout of course (short bus long drops instead of a
long bus with short drops).

> Now 10/100 switches really screw with it.

Those switches are just bridges, which have been around for decades (albeit
with fewer ports).

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Network Manager
						University of York
Received on Fri Jul 27 2001 - 02:17:08 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:33:54 BST