'Good' versions of VMS

From: healyzh_at_aracnet.com <(healyzh_at_aracnet.com)>
Date: Fri Jun 29 21:01:39 2001

> I remember 3.2 as pretty good and 3.2-3.4 less so if you were
> trying to use the new hardware HSC's, RA81's and stuff.
>
> 3.5 and 3.6 were very stable... on 11/7xx boxes and 8600's.
>
> Clusters were new and tricky but useable at 3.6.
>
> Clusters got good by 4.2
>
> This is my best field service memory from almost 20 years ago.
> 1981-86.

Any memory or documentation on what the first version was to support various
hardware platforms (especially for the older stuff)? I've been searching
for that info for ages.

                        Zane
Received on Fri Jun 29 2001 - 21:01:39 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:01 BST