On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Davison, Lee wrote:
> My OCR does fine at 150 dpi on nearly everything and is much
> faster than working with 600 dpi source. The spellchecker gets
> most of the errors. It has to, I can't spell.
That's what counts.
A good context sensitive OCR program should be able to operate at well
BELOW the source resolution -- it needs to differentiate the characters,
not necessarily see all features. (for example: serifs) And with good
enough context sensitivity, a lot of them can be interpolated even if not
recognizable.
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Is Outlook, etc. so incredibly porous that it's necessary to scan plain
text messages??
Are you the one whose system sends an automated response every time
somebody sends an infected attachment to the list?
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin_at_xenosoft.com
Received on Fri Jun 29 2001 - 23:06:27 BST