well, the boxes with intended for multidrop or high-bandwidth serialized
compressed digital video are not on topic for this thread. We're trying to
establish whether there really are digital interfaces to the old (get
it...classic computers... over 10-years old ... using interfaces of that era)
monitors associated with the PC's and MAC's of the EGA era. The use of
sufficient logic or intelligence to manage lossless compression at the monitor
end was not a reality back in the '80's.
I suspect that there's a significant mismatch between this technology and the
PC's of the '80's, with which these TTL or analog monitors under discussion go.
See below, plz.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Davison, Lee" <Lee.Davison_at_merlincommunications.com>
To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:51 AM
Subject: RE: Converting TTL monitor to Analog
>
>
> If it's serialized then it's really moving along! if you've got 1K
> pixels at a
> nominally 65 MHz pixel rate with 24 bits per pixel ... I assume the
> designers at
> least use three channels, one for each color, so as to reduce that
> to 8 bits per
> pixel, right?
>
> Use lossless compression, then even hires displays rarely get over 20Mb/s
>
> For most applications, the distance from the "box" to the display
> isn't far at
> all, but I can see the benefit where a large display might be
> desirable, as in a
> classroom or demonstration environment.
>
> Or multi drop.
>
> Nevertheless, aside from relatively small signal losses, there isn't
> a big
> advantage, aside from the fact that every display manufacturer can
> process the
> signal however he prefers.
>
> Cheaper connectors, cheaper cable, no mismatch artifacts...
>
yes, but not in the market where that price difference would show up next to the
$10k per monitor for the intelligence required to manage the compression and the
DAC's to handle the bandwidth, plus the support logic.
>
> What sort of connector is used for the serialized digital
> arrangement?
>
> BNC mostly.
>
So you'be suggesting 5 bnc's? three for video and two for sync signals?
>
> Lee.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
> information contained in this email may contain information which is
> confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
> and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
>
> If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
> delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
> IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses, by Star Internet,
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre.
> For further information visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
>
>
Received on Fri May 11 2001 - 22:58:37 BST