Tothwolf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>
> > > Doing email through a shell account was pretty painful, with the slow serial
> > > link handlers that UNIX shell accounts offered. The Windows-based email
> > > handlers embedded in Internet Explorer, Netscape, etc, or Eudora, which was
> > > separate, were all MUCH easier and quicker to deal with.
> >
> > Maybe Pine sucked over a serial line, but Elm is much less termcap-spendy. I
> > still use Elm to read my E-mail. Man was meant to read mail on-spool.
>
> Pine...Elm...Mutt...as long as its a console based utility, I'm happy :P
>
> -Toth
I still use netscape for mail. When I got linux to play with I could
never
find a mail server? program that would read mail in the POP format.
Netscape
works fine for now.Ben Franchuk.
--
Live "Pre-historic Cpu's" -- and you thought they were extinct.
www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
Received on Wed Nov 21 2001 - 18:52:31 GMT