-- Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin_at_xenosoft.com On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Richard Erlacher wrote: > Well, that's interesting for sure. Having been in engineering since 1963, I > have to say I've heard the term "one-of" countless times, since that's been the > main thrust of my work since that time, and it is short for one-of-a-kind, while > I started running into the term "one-off" only in the past decade, and, in fact, > have never actually heard it used, only having seen it written. For that > reason, I always thought of it as one of the countless spelling errors one runs > into in the engineering community more and more as engineers are taught to be > literate less and less. > > It surprises me, of course, that a term could be so widely understood, yet used > so seldom by those with whom I've worked, over the past three decades and more, > that I've never heard it used, even once, that I can recall. > > I've heard that explanation a number of times, but still am uncomfortable with > it, as it seems to me to be a misuse/abuse of the language. Perhaps I'm being > too pedantic. > > Dick > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ethan Dicks" <erd_6502_at_yahoo.com> > To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:22 PM > Subject: One-off vs. One-of (was Re: CPU design at the gate level) > > > > > > --- Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com> wrote: > > > Unfortunately for the builders of "one-of's," like me (spelled one-off's > > > in some places, for reasons I don't understand)... > > > > It's not just spelled "one-off", it's pronounced "one-off" - as in > > "Wan Awf", not "Wan Ov". It's an engineer's term for a prototype. > > > > I think you are interpreting it as short for "one of a kind" which I > > don't think it is exactly an abbreviation for. It might be short for > > "run one off the assembly line and stop", though. > > > > Not sure of the history, but it really is "one-off". I first heard the > > term used 17 years ago, not that _it_ was new to the industry, but _I_ > > was new, then. > > > > -ethan > >Received on Fri Nov 02 2001 - 21:34:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:13 BST