On Nov 2, 20:12, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Well, that's interesting for sure. Having been in engineering since
1963, I
> have to say I've heard the term "one-of" countless times, since that's
been the
> main thrust of my work since that time, and it is short for one-of-a-kind
I've never heard "one-of" before, only "one off" (and "2 off", "3 off",
etc) to describe a quantity. It's commonly used here, not just in
engineering.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Received on Sat Nov 03 2001 - 05:25:44 GMT