Re:
> I was limited to software supplied with the machine which seemed
> inadequate compared to VMS and even in the case of EDITOR to vi. I will
understandable.
> If QEDIT is not supplied by HP then I did not have it, nor probably would
> most new admins.
BTW, HP has a company wide license to use QEDIT!
> Indeed, not to me. I will have to dig further. It seems odd to have an
> unsupported workaround for this fundamentual function, and not necessarily
> due to purported stability problems of other OS's.
One method:
:debug
mr pc, _reboot_cpu
c
Or, we can provide you with a free "REBOOT" program if you want it.
> I see these complaints repeatedly and they tend to apply to extremely old
> versions of Unix, and no version of VMS.
HP-UX 11i, for example? Just had to run it on Friday.
> Also, this sounds like a LVM issue rather than a vxfs issue (if your
yep.
> Your comments about system availability, scalability, access to kernel
> debugging information and programming in privileged rings, ease of
> management, and advantages over unix could be taken almost word for word
> from advocates of OpenVMS, and in many cases of System 390, AS/400,
> Tandem, et al. as evidenced by Usenet.
Yep...lot of misinformation out there :)
> It would still be a shame if VMS succumbed to NIH at HP.
we agree.
--
Stan Sieler sieler_at_allegro.com
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html www.sieler.com
Received on Tue Sep 04 2001 - 18:01:13 BST