There will be investigations in the speed that these buildings
came down. Like in Oklahoma there may have been construction
errors.
It also looks like a Towerbuilding that came down in the UK back in
the sixties. It was supported only by the walls of the structure and
a gas explosion took away a few walls. Subsequently part of the building
came down because of the weight of the collapsing concrete above
the explosion. many people lost their lives and building regulations
in the UK were tightened later on.
What happened with the WT-buildings-crash seems to have have
gone in a similar way, only on a grander scale.
Sipke de Wal
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://xgistor.ath.cx
----------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Buckle <geneb_at_deltasoft.com>
To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: World Trade crash...
> > Something else which isn't sitting right is when the first tower collapsed,
> > it looked more like an implosion... the fire and explosion should'nt have
> > compromised the superstructure enough to collapse, and even the weight of
> > the above floors shouldn't have caused a "house of cards" effect like that,
> > seems more like an additional explosion may have been setoff.
> >
> Curt, 10,000lbs of jet fuel would've caused something like that.
>
> g.
>
Received on Tue Sep 11 2001 - 15:04:35 BST