David Woyciesjes skrev:
>! >Isn't the SE an 030 Mac? The Plus is only a 68000.
>!
>! No, the SE was an 8mhz 68000 just like the plus. The SE was
>! basically a
>! newer plus (it had a built in HD or 2 800k floppies, ADB, an
>! expansion
>! slot, and a newer ROM). Later the SE was upgraded to having the
>! SuperDrive (not the NEW superdrive that apple has recycled
>! the name for,
>! but rather the original 1.4mb drive that could read MFS, HFS,
>! DOS, and
>! ProDOS)
>Properly known as the 'Macintosh SE FDHD'. Yep, I got one of these, running
>OS 6.0.7, 50MB HDD, and 4MB RAM...
I've got both kinds, one of which which is equipped with a 3Com Ethernet card.
Unfortunately, 3Com seem to have forgotten all about making such a beast, and
have even managed to reuse its model number on some PCMCIA card. =/
>! There WAS an SE/30 that was a 16mhz (33mhz?) 68030... it was
>! basically an
>! SE, but with the faster processor and 8 simm slots rather than 4... I
>! think THAT is the Mac you are thinking of.
>Yeah, the SE/30 is a 68030, 16MHz; with 68882 FPU and 0.5K of L1 cache! Have
>two of these, OS 7.1 and 7.0.1...
Me too, but shouldn't that be a 68881?
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
We have the most thorough test guy in the world...
I showed him this program and he asked,
'but Rob, what if time runs backward?'
Received on Thu Sep 13 2001 - 23:36:46 BST