Mainframe stuff...

From: emanuel stiebler <emu_at_ecubics.com>
Date: Thu Sep 20 21:13:50 2001

Eric Dittman wrote:
>
> There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
> are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
> for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
> more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
> experimentally).

One remark here. The TPS numbers not always seem to be "logical". Please
notice,
that a lot of the benchmark is influenced by the I/o & disk system. So a
faster CPU not always
has a better TPS number. You can see it many times if you really look
into it.

And, the 4000/90 & /90a are workstations. So TPS is not of so much value
to this ...
 
> There's also a lot of holes in the list.

So fill them ;-)

cheers
Received on Thu Sep 20 2001 - 21:13:50 BST