More US Government running amok!
Joe
>Subject: Adios, Internet Radio
>
>
>=========================================================
>-------- ENEWS AND VIEWS --------
>=========================================================
>Delivering breaking news, as well as analysis and
>commentary, from eWEEK.com
>
>April 3, 2002 // Volume 2, Issue 41
>
>=========================================================
>In This Edition
>=========================================================
>--OUR TAKE
>Adios, Internet Radio
>
>=========================================================
>Our Take
>=========================================================
>ADIOS, INTERNET RADIO
>
>-- By Chris Gonsalves --
>
>I'm a fan of Stardog, personally. Maybe you like CelticGrove
>or BlueCityJazz. Doesn't matter. In a few weeks, listening
>to music on Internet radio will be dead as a mackerel.
>
>Shame really. The Internet radio business has been growing
>at something like 100 percent annually and is thriving in
>genres underrepresented on FM stations, such as classical,
>blues, jazz and gospel. Doesn't matter. The government,
>acting once again in the special interest of the music
>industry, is about to crush the idea.
>
>In the latest example of groundless regulation and greed
>interfering with free commerce, the U.S. Copyright Office is
>considering a proposal that would force Internet radio
>stations to pay exorbitant royalties to record companies and
>performers, something their over-the-air counterparts are
>not required to do.
>
>Where AM and FM radio stations pay a small fee to music
>composers, Internet radio stations are facing fees of up to
>14 cents per listener per song. That fee would bankrupt
>nearly all of the Web broadcasters operating today,
>according to the group saveinternetradio.org.
>
>Copyright officials have until May 21 to make the call, but
>considering that the recommended shakedown came from the
>advisory group they created--the Copyright Arbitration
>Royalty Panel (CARP for short)--it's clear the rubber stamp
>is warmed up and waiting.
>
>How did we get to this point? Even if you thought Napster
>and others of their ilk were the bad guys, how did Internet
>radio become to the target of the Harry Fox crowd? It began
>in October 1998, when Congress passed the "Digital
>Millennium Copyright Act" (DMCA), which gave record
>companies the green light to collect royalties when music
>was played via "digital media" such as Internet radio.
>
>It's an interesting departure from a music industry
>standpoint. Record companies and performers don't get
>royalties from AM and FM radio play because the copyright
>folks consider the promotional value of the airplay payment
>enough. So why the switch for the Internet? The theory
>bought by Congress is that Internet listeners can make
>"perfect copies" of the songs being streamed, and those
>copies could hurt CD sales. That would be a good argument,
>except that, as anyone who listens to Internet Radio knows,
>you can't make "perfect copies." You can't easily make
>copies at all. And if you can, they are of too low a sound
>quality to be useful in creating your own CDs. What you get
>sounds pretty much like those cassette tapes you used to
>make off the FM radio. Not great.
>
>Never ones to let facts stand in their way, the solons
>assigned to the CARP published their recommended royalty
>schedule in late February. As the basis for the outrageous
>fee schedule, the CARP report cites a $5 billion deal
>between Yahoo! and Broadcast.com. The result was a figure
>that would leave most Internet broadcasters, who have
>attracted precious little advertising, liable for between
>200 and 300 percent of their gross revenues. And, oh, by the
>way, the fees are retroactive to October 1998. According to
>Internet radio industry figures, a midsize independent
>Webcaster with an average audience of 1,000 would owe
>$525,600.
>
>See you later Stardog. It was nice knowing you.
>
>To e-mail eWEEK Deputy News Editor Chris Gonsalves,
>click here:
>mailto:chris_gonsalves_at_ziffdavis.com
>
>=========================================================
>News
>=========================================================
>1. ADDITIONAL IE/APACHE PROBLEMS SURFACE
>
>eWEEK Labs' Timothy Dyck last month advised readers to use a
>combination of HTTPS and basic authentication to get secure
>log-in functionality that works with all browsers and Web
>servers. It turns out that this approach won't work all the
>time, either. To read the story, click here:
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gLO0A2
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>2. PAIR OF OFFICE XP BUGS UNCOVERED
>
>A well-known security researcher has released an advisory
>about--and exploit code for--two new unpatched flaws in
>portions of Microsoft Corp.'s Office XP application suite.
>The two bugs are closely related and, if used in concert,
>could enable an attacker to gain complete control over a
>vulnerable machine. To read the story, click here:
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJj0AS
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>3. INTEL TO CUT CHIP PRICING BY 57 PERCENT
>
>Intel is set to cut prices on its top-performing Pentium 4
>chips by as much as 25 percent this month and up to 57
>percent this spring. To read the story, click here:
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJm0AV
>
>=========================================================
>Now at eWEEK.com
>=========================================================
>1. PETER COFFEE: THE LONG ROAD TO SIMPLE SYSTEMS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gLP0A3
>
>2. NETWORK APPLIANCE TARGETS REMOTE ACCESS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gLQ0A4
>
>3. A SECURITY EXTENSION FOR MICROSOFT OPERATIONS MANAGER
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gLR0A5
>
>4. SUN BUILDS OUT JAVA TOOL SETS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJn0AW
>
>5. HP BOARD BALKS AT HEWLETT RENOMINATION
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0fva0A1
>
>6. NAI TOOL SCANS FOR NETWORK CRACKS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJk0AT
>
>=========================================================
>Elsewhere on Ziff Davis
>=========================================================
>1. JOHN C. DVORAK: NANODRIVE USES INSECT PARTS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJr0Aa
>
>2. ULTRAPORTABLES: HOW LOW CAN THEY GO?
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJq0AZ
>
>3. ARE SERVER APPLIANCES RIGHT FOR YOUR BUSINESS?
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJs0Ab
>
>4. LINUX X WINDOWS FLAW LETS INTRUDERS IN
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gJt0Ac
>
>5. BILL MACHRONE: XML SECURITY RISKS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gLS0A6
>
>6. A CHEAT SHEET FOR CRM SUCCESS
>http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo?y=ePOu0BzN6x0DUm0gLT0A7
>
>Copyright (c) 2002 Ziff Davis Media Inc. All Rights
>Reserved.
>
Received on Wed Apr 03 2002 - 07:52:14 BST