now, this is just a short excerpt ...
> ""If we prevent them from doing stupid things, we also prevent
> them from doing creative things"" - Cant Remember Who
>
> And these new things are seem seemless because the system
seamless
> concepts are extensable with flexability in depth
extensible flexibility
>
> Winblows by contrast has the depth of leftist reason and
> the flexability of a socialist utopian machine gunner setting up
flexibility
> 40 paces from a fresh dug mass grave ditch.
> and like winblows, equal use and benifit to you if your aim and desire
> dont fit with theirs.
don't
>
> Flexability is freedom, freedom gives birth to creativity.
Flexibility
Every one of your posts has this sort of syntax/orthographic error in
quantity. Doesn't your OS' email handler have a spell-checker?
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Moyers" <rmoyers_at_nop.org>
To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)
> On Monday 22 April 2002 20:28, you wrote:
>
> > > Ok so you dont know anything about unix, thats what you are
> > > saying here.
> >
> > True, but considering most of unix was developed
> > in a educational atmosphere were only a few programs ran
> > -- text editor -- C Compiler -- TROFF at once because that
> > all a student or staff member could run because resorce limitations.
>
> And today you have enough hardware in a PC box to support
> 5,000 people doing the same thing, not that your lust for faster
> hardware is over, because unix is doing things that Ken and Dennis
> never envisioned.
>
> http://www.nop.org/misc/unix/ken-and-den.gif
>
> ""If we prevent them from doing stupid things, we also prevent
> them from doing creative things"" - Cant Remember Who
>
> And these new things are seem seemless because the system
> concepts are extensable with flexability in depth
>
> Winblows by contrast has the depth of leftist reason and
> the flexability of a socialist utopian machine gunner setting up
> 40 paces from a fresh dug mass grave ditch.
> and like winblows, equal use and benifit to you if your aim and desire
> dont fit with theirs.
>
> Flexability is freedom, freedom gives birth to creativity.
>
> > > Its also apparent that everything you have been told about it came
> > > from those equally ignorant, they are all wrong.
> >
> > What is true or false is not important as this is the view I have
> > of the systems with the knowlage and understanding from what I have
> > seen.
>
> True or false dont matter ? you really would make a good leftist
> ( called liberal today, even as the real liberal is the opposite of a
> leftist, its George Orwells newspeak, todays liberals are not liberals
> they are leftists, perhaps Marxocrat would be a good label )
>
> > > Gimp dont translate to a tty very well, but an xterm is certainly the
> > > bitmapped representation of the tty.
> >
> > BUT I MAY NOT WANT a bit map when running under XWINDOWS!
> > I want a 80x25 screen (640x480) because I can read the screen for
> > text-editing!
> > No font's under X-windows (linux) would give me that!
>
>
> What makes you think they wont ? you can have any size you want.
>
>
> > > Unix already has this X11 is a standard you can run your sun apps
> > > your irix apps your freebsd apps all on the GUI of your linux box all
> > > at once. and last time i looked, all the other systems have adopted
> > > our plumbing, not the other way around.
> >
> > It is not the plumbing -- it is what goes down the pipe that needs to
> > be standarded!
>
>
> This is wrong, to do so would eliminate creativity.
>
> New protocols are invented every day, the usefull ones end up
> being adopted and the bad ones on the ashheap.
>
> Software darwinism is a good thing.
>
>
> > > eh ? what would be wrong with a nice large 4096 x 3192 screen
> > > with whatever size fonts you desire ? and the ability to populate
> > > that screen with the workload of a whole stack of boxes.
>
> > 1) Not everybody has the same standard fonts!
> > 2) I like 1 screen 1 program and screen flipping.
>
> This is wrong ... X11 does come with a full set of standard
> fonts. and adding more is easy.
>
> > > "Well the end user experience" is system agnostic except
> > > for the winblows limitations that dumbs your system down
> > > to the microset winblows can provide. unix has point and
> > > click too, but it isnt implimented stupidly.
> >
> > But the 3 button mouse is hard to find!
>
> On a 2 button mouse, you press both buttons to simulate
> button 3, it works smoothly and perfectly well.
>
> > > You would make a good leftist, the asurdity seems high enough.
>
> > After 40 years waiting for public space travel, my faith in NASA
> > is wearing thin.
>
> Public space travel to where ?
>
> I also dream of the day when a colony on mars is in full tilt of the 100
> - 1000 year job of terraforming the place, complete with a planetary
> mag field generator to fend off them nasty solar rays, but we are
> still suffreing the leftist egalitarian poison that has raped the planet
> of man potential. ( and left 200 million of its citizens in mass graves )
>
> When the social enginners are no longer putting the jackboots
> of goverment on the necks of the acheavers in the name of
> "social justice" and the envirowackos stand fully discredited
> by the emissions data from the volcano Penetubo, perhaps then
> we can get along back to the accent of man.
>
> Raymond
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 23 2002 - 10:47:32 BST
