Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Tue Apr 23 12:45:48 2002

I thought that in cases where the entire message fits on a single screen, it's
easier if the reply is at the top. Putting the assorted wisecracks and
wisdoms in line means one cannot as easily prune out irrelevant materials
without losing contextual references.

BTW, I was looking through a couple of old MOTORLA assembly listings for a few
days, and they containe a pseudo-op '.SPC' which apparently means "insert a
few lines of white space here." Your initials threw me a real curve for a
time.

Dick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner" <spc_at_conman.org>
To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)


> It was thus said that the Great Richard Erlacher once stated:
> >
> > Well, so what's the verdict? How should multi-threaded "spirited"
> > discussions, which often wander all over the place be handled, where
quoting
> > the context is concerned?
>
> Inline.
>
> -spc (Please see above)
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 23 2002 - 12:45:48 BST