"Toy" computers (was Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Fred Cisin <cisin_at_xenosoft.com>
Date: Wed Apr 24 19:29:12 2002

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Christopher Smith wrote:
> Let's at least agree on what
> > constitutes a "toy", even in the most general of terms.
> I'd say anything that runs windows primarily. *duck*

To be defined as a "TOY", doesn't it have to be FUN?
Received on Wed Apr 24 2002 - 19:29:12 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Fred Cisin: "Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)"
Previous message: Marvin Johnston: ""R.I.P. for D.I.Y.""
In reply to: Christopher Smith: ""Toy" computers (was Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)"
Next in thread: Richard Erlacher: ""Toy" computers (was Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:33 BST