Reuben Reyes wrote:
> Why has Micro$oft not gone after "X Windows", this looks
> even closer to the actual name of Windows, but since it
> is freely available they cant zero in on anybody/company.
>
> http://www.strath.ac.uk/CC/Courses/oldXC/subsection3_3_1.html#SECTION0003100000000000000
Partially because it's a specification rather than an actual product, so
MS wouldn't have the same sort of basis for a lawsuit (if any at all).
Received on Sun Aug 18 2002 - 11:25:00 BST