Microsoft vs Lindows

From: James E. LaBarre <>
Date: Sun Aug 18 11:25:00 2002

Reuben Reyes wrote:
> Why has Micro$oft not gone after "X Windows", this looks
> even closer to the actual name of Windows, but since it
> is freely available they cant zero in on anybody/company.

Partially because it's a specification rather than an actual product, so
   MS wouldn't have the same sort of basis for a lawsuit (if any at all).
Received on Sun Aug 18 2002 - 11:25:00 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:37 BST