On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 06:22:47PM -0500, Doc Shipley wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > >
> > > No, that was the Commodore 64 until it proves otherwise. The CoCo2 is
> > > still up in the air, though I am leaning towards "crap" because of the
> > > limited video output capability ;)
> >
> > Presumably by this criterion the Cray is totally 'crap' because it has no
> > video output at all?
>
> No, it's crap before that, because it won't run Windows 95.
<cool knowitall dude>
And what is even worse, it doesn't run $SHOOTER_GAME_WITH_COOL_3D_GRAPHICS,
therefore it is totally useless. Aren't computers, like, made for gaming
or something?
Using computers for real computing or even - heaven forbid - to get work
done is just soooo backwards and oldfashioned and, like, soooo totally
uncool.
</cool knowitall dude>
SCNR,
Alex.
--
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison
Received on Thu Aug 29 2002 - 05:56:01 BST