Maybe OT: Network ethics

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Sun Feb 3 06:12:17 2002

On Feb 2, 23:54, Jeffrey S. Sharp wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
>
> > For some ultra-secure type site, wiring the other two pairs to detect a
> > connection, and or to deliver 48VDC (from a spare telephone switch
> > supply) would deter all but the most determined.
>
> Or even have it so that unused RJ45 wall jacks are wired to a nearby
> electric outlet. "Oh, you plugged into one of our proprietary power
> ports...".

:-) You would have a serious liability problem with that. Damage to
equipment, fire hazard, danger to personnel (including authorised personnel
who have to use patch panels etc), and at least here it would be illegal as
the low-voltage RJ45 sockets, cabling, etc, don't meet insulation and
protection requirements.

> Or use (or invent, if they do not exist) wall jack panels that have a
> lockable metal door.

They do exist, but are expensive, and you need to fix the PC end too.
 Anyway, people just leave them unlocked.

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Network Manager
						University of York
Received on Sun Feb 03 2002 - 06:12:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:43 BST