Mac IIsi vs. IIci

From: Huw Davies <Huw.Davies_at_kerberos.davies.net.au>
Date: Mon Feb 4 01:23:12 2002

At 12:51 AM 4/02/2002 -0500, Chris wrote:
> >My absolutely standard IIcx runs A/UX and as the main difference between a
> >IIcx and a IIci is the number of Nubus slots, it'll just work
>
>Actually, they both have 3 NuBus slots (only the ci has built in video,
>so you don't loose a slot right off the bat to a video card). The main
>difference between a IIx and a IIcx is the number of slots (the cx was a
>baby x basically, but handles 4x the ram)
>
>There are a number of differences between the ci and the cx. The ci was
>more or less a replacement "next generation" for the cx. The ci is 32 bit
>clean (cx is not), has built in video, a cache slot, and is a bit faster
>(25 vs 16MHz).


That's what happens when you post at the end of a long day. Chris is
perfectly right, I'd confused a IIx with a IIci. Must be old age.....


Huw Davies | e-mail: Huw.Davies_at_kerberos.davies.net.au
                      | "If God had wanted soccer played in the
                      | air, the sky would be painted green"
Received on Mon Feb 04 2002 - 01:23:12 GMT