Find while at the in-lawst

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Tue Feb 5 16:17:10 2002

On Feb 5, 14:21, Bryan Pope wrote:
> And thusly Christopher Smith spake:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin_at_xenosoft.com]
> >
> > > > that they literally use it as a door stop (they have the
> > > monitor in use
> > > > proping a door open... makes me cringe every time I am over there).
> >
> > > Wrong machine for the job. Everybody knows that a
> > > Timex-Sinclair is the
> > > best doorstop.
> >
> > I don't know. Something heavier is probably better. Maybe a PET?
> > A small mini/deskside would certainly hold a door open well...
> > or anything in a BA23 enclosure with floor-stand.
> >
> > A commodore 128 also might have a chance of actually wedging into
> > the space between the door and the floor.
> >
>
> OK OK!!! This has gone a little too far!!!!! We've recently lost a PET
to a
> manical rampaging battlebot, we don't need to relegate them to door stop
> duty.

I agree. Anyway, you don't need a PET for that. An SBC like a KIM-1 is
much better; you can wedge it right into the gap under the door.

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Network Manager
						University of York
Received on Tue Feb 05 2002 - 16:17:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:44 BST