On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:03:49PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> :-) I have a bunch of UDA50, both for my PDP-11s, and for the 8650.
Hmpf. I need the machine for a UDA50. Don't you have a PDP 11/70
handy? ;-)
> However, the Ultrix driver is a beautiful beast. When you declare an MSCP
> disk, you don't say where it's located. You just say:
> disk ra<x> at mscp drive <y>
>
> Controllers are declared as:
> controller uda0 at uba0
> controller uq0 at uda0
> controller hsc0 at ci0
>
> And then the disks can be either at hsc0 or uq0, and you can move them
> without problems.
> DSSI is yet another, and so on...
This is also true for NetBSD. From my knowledge the shebang should
be build like this:
mainbus0 at root
ibus0 at mainbus0
shac0 at ibus0
sii0 at ibus0
dssibus* at shac?
dssibus* at sii?
scs* at dssibus?
mscpbus* at scs?
(SCS, System Communication Services seams to be the protocol that
is spoken on a DSSI bus and that transports MSCP. Got this from
http://www3.sympatico.ca/n.rieck/docs/vax_vms_storage_notes.html)
Maybe HSC instead of SCS, don't know, I hve no manuals...
I can get a KA680 TM from a friend. So what is really needed
is information about DSSI. (I am afraid that this is hard to get.)
> True. And also, the NetBSD RA support have some bug in it, along with
> being very much tied to the UDA50/KDA50 right now.
As Ragge already stated, at least the last objection is not true
anymore. The NetBSD MSCP stuff resides now in sys/dev/mscp what means
that it is machine independent. This also implies proper abstraction
of the MSCP stuff from the underlieing controller hardware.
--
tsch??,
Jochen
Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
Received on Wed Feb 27 2002 - 07:14:35 GMT