Fwd: 2 IBM PS/2s, DC/MD area

From: Russ Blakeman <rhblakeman_at_kih.net>
Date: Wed Jan 16 21:58:38 2002

It's a toss between a few of them running 486DX2-66 and better, mostly the
Server 95-486, the 90 and 70. They all had a L2 cache option in various
configs making them way fastre than the SLC and non-cached versions.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Tothwolf
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:35 PM
To: classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Fwd: 2 IBM PS/2s, DC/MD area


On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Julius Sridhar wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
> >
> > > Right, I didn't even think about the ISA machines. I've seen so many
> > > of the microchannel systems that I often forget about the others.
> > > As I think about it, I might actually have several model 25s
> > > instead of 50s. Guess I'll find out once I uncover them.
> >
> > It's hard to confuse them. The 25 is an all-in-one. The easier ones
> > to confuse are the 30 and the 55SX, as they came in the same case.
>
> The 35 and 56 also had similar cases despite one is ISA and one is
> microchannel. The 60, 65 and 80 towers are very easy to mistake as the
> only external difference is the logo plate.

I know I have 3 model 60 machines in various conditions. What was the
fastest 486 class microchannel machine that was made?

-Toth
Received on Wed Jan 16 2002 - 21:58:38 GMT