Bell & Howell Apple II update

From: Fred Cisin <>
Date: Fri Jan 25 22:44:46 2002

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Well, that's possible, but we're talking several generations' difference,
> since the MAC was '85 or so while the Apple ][ was '78-'79. They may both be
> a long time back, but the ][+ was the guy whose video connector was under
> discussion. ISTR that the Apple ][ was capable of generating interlaced video
> at something on the order of 512x480. Maybe someone more knowledgable
> regarding ][+ video capabilities can clear that up, but it was something not
> too far from what the typical TV would do.

That does not aound right for the video capabilities of the ][+.
Wasn't it closer to 280? x 192?? (expanded to 560? x 192? on 2e?)

Apple 2 and IBM CGA both had coonectors explicitly for RF modulator. Most
popular at the time was SupRMod? on ch34.
Received on Fri Jan 25 2002 - 22:44:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:58 BST