Please Gods, NOOOOOOO. Can you see the arguments arising over a
rating ? I miss Ward, his libertarian instincts would jump on this like a dog
with a bone. Provided balance of a sort and he did know TRS80s. Mini and
micro people would be all over each other. And I would be in a minus rating
because of my non-industry ignorance. Then how would I get help in simple
repair tasks for my collection ?
Lawrence
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > > The discussion was about microcomputers and, specifically, the video
> > > connector on the Apple ][. When the Apple ][ came out, cable TV was not yet
> > > a common
> >
> > No it is not. You are darn good at subtly changing the terms of an
> > argument and thus proving your point to be correct.
>
> Wouldn't it be great if there were some sort of rating system for
> subscribers to the list? It would be nice to be able to vote on each
> message that gets posted. Those getting a thumbs up vote boost the score
> of the subscriber. Those getting a thumbs down would lower it. Newbies
> would start off at 0.
>
> The subscriber's score would automatically be prepended to the subject
> line so you could see at a glance whether a message was worth it to
> you to read or not.
>
> Of course there's the delete command, but a scoring system would prevent
> run-on threads arguing over senseless matters as promulgated over and over
> again by certain subscribers.
>
> Oh well, I don't think Majordomo is equipped to handle this sort of thing.
> I guess we're doomed to being annoyed.
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
>
Reply to:
lgwalker_at_mts.net
Received on Mon Jan 28 2002 - 17:36:22 GMT