[CCTECH] List Management Q/A

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Tue Jul 9 02:19:00 2002

On Jul 8, 19:30, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:

> > Does the list archiver honor the 'X-NoArchive: Yes' line?
> No.

As Frank wrote, the normal form is "X-No-Archive: yes".

> Would anyone mind if "[cctalk]" was appended to all subject headers sent
> cctalk?

I could live with it, but I'd really prefer not to. It's not necessary for
filtering, given that several headers already have th list name in them:

>From cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org Tue Jul 9 06:50:13 2002
To: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
X-BeenThere: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
Sender: cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org
Errors-To: cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org
X-BeenThere: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
X-Reply-To: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
List-Id: Classic Computer Discussion - Unmoderated <cctalk.classiccmp.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cctalk-request_at_classiccmp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
List-Archive: <http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/>

These are headers from your post, originally to CCTECH, but you can see
that by the time it was crossposted to CCTALK, most had become CCTALK

Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Network Manager
						University of York
Received on Tue Jul 09 2002 - 02:19:00 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:01 BST