On Jul 8, 19:30, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
> > Does the list archiver honor the 'X-NoArchive: Yes' line?
>
> No.
As Frank wrote, the normal form is "X-No-Archive: yes".
> Would anyone mind if "[cctalk]" was appended to all subject headers sent
to
> cctalk?
I could live with it, but I'd really prefer not to. It's not necessary for
filtering, given that several headers already have th list name in them:
>From cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org Tue Jul 9 06:50:13 2002
To: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
X-BeenThere: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
Sender: cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org
Errors-To: cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org
X-BeenThere: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
Reply-To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
X-Reply-To: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
List-Unsubscribe: <
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
<mailto:cctalk-request_at_classiccmp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Classic Computer Discussion - Unmoderated <cctalk.classiccmp.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cctalk-request_at_classiccmp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
<mailto:cctalk-request_at_classiccmp.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/>
These are headers from your post, originally to CCTECH, but you can see
that by the time it was crossposted to CCTALK, most had become CCTALK
headers.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Received on Tue Jul 09 2002 - 02:19:00 BST