China bans toxic American computer junk
None of this works (for the US) as long as don't revamp the welfare system.
I endorse mandatory non-permanent sterilization for anyone on welfare. And
if you have a kid while you're on welfare, you automatically lose all
benefits.
If may be your right to breed, but not while I'm supporting your lazy butt
with my tax dollars.
--John
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org]On
Behalf Of Carlos Murillo
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 10:30
To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: China bans toxic American computer junk
At 10:49 PM 6/8/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Sort of... only the solution can be less painful:
>
>All people need to do is stop having so many babies. This is why I
>support the "W.C. Fields Memorial Child Tax Bill," a progressively
>incrementing tax on children. One child, a somewhat low tax, such as
>an education tax. Two children, a higher tax is applied. Three
>children, a much higher tax is applied, etc. No more tax deductions
>for dependent children; instead, allow childless people to have
>generous deductions for pets, computer collections (if all of the
>computers are named), plants, etc. It might not hurt to outlaw the
>discouragement of birth control and outlaw any religious dogma which
>encourages people to have children. Give tax breaks to childless
>people and don't tax them for any costs associated with children
>(e.g. education, health care, etc.) Etc.... In other words, reduce
>the population fairly quickly through a decline in the birth rate.
>Simple, humane and effective, what?
But dead wrong. Such an incentive would be positively correlated with
an increase in poverty, which is in turn positively correlated with
an increase in babies.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo_at_nospammers.ieee.org
Received on Sun Jun 09 2002 - 10:07:15 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:05 BST