Palladium and classic computing

From: Sellam Ismail <foo_at_siconic.com>
Date: Thu Jun 27 15:31:27 2002

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Eric Smith wrote:

> > This Palladium stupidity won't fly. Remember how people
> > howled when Intel put unique IDs into their processors?
>
> Yes, but now we're fighting terrorism. Polls show that more than
> 55% of US citizens surveyed now want to give up their civil liberties
> to be protected from terrorism. :-(

I say we deport that 55% to Afghanistan and make them work in the poppy
fields. The side benefit would be that those people will hopefully become
too doped up to ever find their way back to the US and pollute it with
their flawed ideals.

> Others have pointed out that if this stuff all goes through, people
> who don't run Windows will lose access to most of the Internet (best
> case), or possibly have to create another parallel Internet (if it
> remains legal to do so). But another effect is that non-Palladium
> hardware will become very expensive.

I am all for creating a parallel internet. It would be a chance to start
over, learn from the mistakes of Internet 1, and improve it to the point
that it makes people still on Internet 1 long to be on Son of Internet.
Then everyone migrates to Son of Internet, Internet 1 dies, Palladium goes
with it, Microsoft loses it's grip on the market, and everyone lives
happily ever after.

THE END

Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org

 * Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Received on Thu Jun 27 2002 - 15:31:27 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:07 BST