The //e is 1mhz, the //gs is 4mhz, I don't know about the //c+. I would
imagine that no //e+ was made because unlike the //c the //e is quite
expandable with it's many expansion slots.
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
Julius Sridhar wrote:
>
> Is the //c+ faster than the //e? How much faster is the //gs than the
> //c+? Why didn't they release the //e+?
>
> Peace... Sridhar
Received on Mon Mar 04 2002 - 00:51:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:09 BST