"Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" wrote:
> The 4004 was once rumored to have been named that because it had the
> equivalent of 4004 transistors.
> THAT is what probably gave rise to the 68000 silliness.
> It's MUCH more impressive what was done with only 486!
Shoudn't that read "80486"?
--
Andreas Freiherr
Vishay Semiconductor GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
http://www.vishay.com
Received on Wed May 15 2002 - 12:01:03 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:16 BST