***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small "problem" between
the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape handle the Reply-To (or is it
Sender) field in a message..****
! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob_at_copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca]
!
! Sure is quiet, isn't it? But I'm listening, and this can
! serve as a test of my
! ability to submit to the list by the simple expedient of
! hitting "reply" in my
! mailer window.
Yeah, cctech is kinda quiet, but I believe that has to do with the
whole moderation thing, and discussions branching off once they get
re-posted to cctalk.
I'm currently subscribed to both. I have rules in place to send
messages from each list to separate folders. That way, depending on my
mood, and workload, I can follow the wandering discussion on cctalk, or
just read whatever meat comes through on cctech.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2:
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
_______________________________________________
cctech mailing list
cctech_at_classiccmp.org
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
Received on Thu May 30 2002 - 09:47:09 BST