Interesting! I haven't used it myself, but I have thought about trying it
from time to time. It makes sense that the 1MB address space would have to
be bank switched, but 8K windows sounds like a bit of a pain. Too bad...
--tom
At 11:05 AM 5/30/02 -0400, you wrote:
> In my previous post, I deliberately left Rabbit out. I played with that
>board, wanting to implement a fairly little simple TCP/IP server for my
>weather station. While it claims a 1MB address space, your code executes in
>two 8K sliding windows. And apparently, arraning windows or some BS like
>that is left to the user.
>
> All I know for sure is that I'm a fairly experience micro person, and I
>couldn't get it to work. My object file was something like 43K with their
>stack compiled in. And it was claimed to be "too large". The limited help
>I got from Rabbit was an example of how to do it, which was a complete
>re-write of my code, and not in a way that made sense. It's a little
>difficult to explain, but in spite of Fred Eadys paid endorsement for them,
>it sucks.
>
> With all the other choices in micros out there, the Rabbit is best left in
>the dumpster^wbox.
>
> --John
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-admin_at_classiccmp.org]On
>Behalf Of Tom Uban
>Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:48
>To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: CP/M TCP/IP (was Re: CP/M coding question)
>
>
>You could use a Rabbit board: http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/
>
>--tom
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 30 2002 - 10:23:15 BST