Dave: check into Eudora, seems to work better =)
-John
At 10:47 AM 5/30/02, you wrote:
>***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small "problem" between
>the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape handle the Reply-To (or is it
>Sender) field in a message..****
>
>! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob_at_copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca]
>!
>! Sure is quiet, isn't it? But I'm listening, and this can
>! serve as a test of my
>! ability to submit to the list by the simple expedient of
>! hitting "reply" in my
>! mailer window.
>
> Yeah, cctech is kinda quiet, but I believe that has to do with the
>whole moderation thing, and discussions branching off once they get
>re-posted to cctalk.
> I'm currently subscribed to both. I have rules in place to send
>messages from each list to separate folders. That way, depending on my
>mood, and workload, I can follow the wandering discussion on cctalk, or
>just read whatever meat comes through on cctech.
>
>
>--- David A Woyciesjes
>--- C & IS Support Specialist
>--- Yale University Press
>--- (203) 432-0953
>--- ICQ # - 905818
>Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2:
>Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
>_______________________________________________
>cctech mailing list
>cctech_at_classiccmp.org
>http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
----------------------------------------
Founder, Lead Writer, Tech Analyst
and Web Designer Boff-Net Technologies
http://boff-net.dhs.org/index.html
---------------------------------------
Received on Thu May 30 2002 - 20:02:18 BST