Actually the delay was amost certainly my own fault. I subscribed to the list
using one mail address and then tried to reply to an incoming digest using a
different one. So I un- and re- subscribed, and now *this* should serve as a
test that I can post to the group. Look no further than the nearest user for
your software "problems" :-)
>Message: 4
>From: David Woyciesjes <DAW_at_yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu>
>To: "'cctech_at_classiccmp.org'" <cctech_at_classiccmp.org>
>Subject: RE: [CCTECH] Re: anybody out there?
>Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:47:09 -0400
>Reply-To: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
>
>***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small "problem" between
>the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape handle the Reply-To (or is it
>Sender) field in a message..****
>
>! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob_at_copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca]
>!
>! Sure is quiet, isn't it?
| the digital divide is an issue of poverty;
Bob Bramwell 60 Baker Cr. NW | if we can eliminate the information
ProntoLogical Calgary, AB | barriers, we'll all live in a safer,
+1 403/861-8827 T2L 1R4, Canada | more prosperous world.
| - John Gage, Sun's chief researcher.
_______________________________________________
cctech mailing list
cctech_at_classiccmp.org
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
Received on Thu May 30 2002 - 13:04:53 BST