So-Called Real Programmers and FORTRAN

From: Sellam Ismail <foo_at_siconic.com>
Date: Sat May 4 13:57:07 2002

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Ben Franchuk wrote:

> "Douglas H. Quebbeman" wrote:
>
> > My Data Structures prof lamented the fact (by his observation)
> > that most people write Pascal in its FORTRAN subset...
>
> 10 C WHAT SUBSET IS THAT?
> 20 C MY GRIPE WITH PASCAL WAS THAT IT WAS ALL ONE PROGRAM
> 30 C EVERY FORTRAN AFTER II COULD HAVE MODULES DEFINED
> 40 C .NOR. COULD YOU EVER FIGURE OUT
> 50 C WHEN TO PUT A SEMI-COLEN .OR. .NOT. AT THE END OF A
> 60 C STATEMENT
> 100 STOP

It could be argued that any language with line numbers is not a real
programming language, but merely, say, a beginner's all purpose symbolic
instruction code.

Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org

 * Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Received on Sat May 04 2002 - 13:57:07 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:20 BST