From: Glen Goodwin <acme_ent_at_bellsouth.net>
>> From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk_at_jetnet.ab.ca>
>
>> I think small and clean ( bootstrap able too is handy) languages are few
>> and far between. C was that at one time, but not any more. While I don't
>> expect complers to run in 64kb I think 64 Meg is far too much bloat.
>
>So, use an older C compiler. I still use Turbo C++ 1.0. The C++
>implementation sucks, but for "real" C code under MS-DOS, it still kicks
>ass, and runs in 640 Kb. I wish I had something as good for CP/M-86 :>(
Borland TurboPascal V5.5 and TurboCV2.01 They are 8086 sized and still
produce good code that seems to run fine under W98se and NT4.
Allison
Received on Tue May 07 2002 - 08:08:31 BST