Classic Computers vs. Micro$oft 'droids (was: What other lists...)

From: R. D. Davis <rdd_at_rddavis.org>
Date: Wed May 8 21:32:53 2002

Quothe Fred Cisin (XenoSoft), from writings of Wed, May 08, 2002 at 06:29:45PM -0700:
> Sure. But on this list, let's stick with the things that they did wrong
> over 10 years ago, such as SMARTDRIVE. Complaints, no matter how valid,
> about Windoze95 should be saved for another two and a half years. THEN

Very well said; I don't think that any of us can argue with that.

> 'Course for us old farts, it's hard to accept that even Amiga and Mac or
> on-topic. Were they really THAT long ago?

No. It seems like they were introduced only a few years ago; heck, it
can't have been that long since I first read the article in Popular
Electronics about the details of the features of the Commodore 64.
They're all far newer than my car, so they can't be that old.
Hmmmm... actually, my PDP-8/e is about the same age as my car. More
proof that our classic computers may be vintage systems, but they're
not old. ;-)

-- 
Copyright (C) 2001 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals: 
All Rights Reserved            an unnatural belief that we're above Nature & 
rdd_at_rddavis.org  410-744-4900  her other creatures, using dogma to justify such
http://www.rddavis.org         beliefs and to justify much human cruelty.
Received on Wed May 08 2002 - 21:32:53 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:22 BST