> "He has something personal against me".
Remember your post on this forum that started this over
a year ago when you refered to me as "the worlds biggest
fool" for paying x$ on EBAY for a vintage chip?
When you come out of the blue and start refering to people
as "fools" for collecting chips, what do you expect chip
collectors to think about your views on chip collecting?
> He chose to use a public forum to attack me.
See "worlds biggest fool post above"
> "Twist your words"?
I'm not twisting your words Sellam. I think you are just
finding it hard to make your point with out sounding
obnoxious and arrogant and others are noticing it.
I think it's really fun watching you publically humiliate yourself.
If I were you I would stop now before you humiliate
yourself even more. Go have a cup of tea with Toth.
I bet you two would really hit it off.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sellam Ismail" <foo_at_siconic.com>
To: <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: Gripes was Re: Promoting Classic Computers [was Re: Chip with
holes in it]
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Marvin Johnston wrote:
>
> > BTW, this is not only directed to you but *everyone* who is contributing
> > nothing but emotional gripes; GET A LIFE. John has contributed some
> > valuable information and seems to have a handle on the chip collecting
> > side of things. Lets take advantage of his knowledge rather than trying
> > to piss him off because of your personal problems.
>
> I'll respond to this by repeating what "John" said to me:
>
> It's a shame that the chip collector community can not find someone with a
> better bed side manner to promote your hobby.
>
> He has something personal against me. He chose to use a public forum to
> attack me. Go tile the ocean.
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at
www.VintageTech.com *
>
Received on Sat Nov 16 2002 - 17:29:15 GMT