Thanks James.
g.
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, James Rice wrote:
> Actually, I prefer pdf format. I tend to store documentation on CD's
> and print if necessary. The pdf format is much easier to print and
> handle, no editing of links, etc.
>
> Just my opinion,
>
> James
>
> Gene Buckle wrote:
>
> >I'm in the process of OCR'ing a full set of the Staunch 8/89'er
> >newsletters for addition to the Commercial CP/M Archive.
> >
> >My problem is that while HTML renderings of the newsletters is acceptable,
> >the PDF version that ABBYY FineReader generates is spectacular.
> >
> >Do you folks think I should produce them as PDF, HTML or both?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >g.
> >http://www.retroarchive.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://webpages.charter.net/jrice54/classiccomp2.html
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:09:00 BST