Obsolecence (Was RE: OT: PC Motherboard with a vacuum tube)
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Doc Shipley wrote:
> > vendors and rental shops would not be flocking to DVD. VHS cassettes &
> > players have always been a big, huge, clunky, temperamental-and-easily-
> > borked, slow-to-set-up PITA. DVD are none of those things.
>
> "big, clunky": The size difference is NOT that much.
> "slow-to-set-up": When used for playing pre-recorded materials, the setup
> for VCR v DVD is IDENTICAL. All of the differences lie in setup needed
I wasn't clear. Setup at my house includes skipping trailers and soda
ads. Therein lies a huge difference.
As for "big, clunky", have you raised toddlers around VCR's & CD
players? The relative invitation to insertion of foreign objects is
amazing.
> But abused DVD produces a better signal than abused VCR, just as
> abused audio CD produces better sound than abused cassette tape.
Oh, I completely agree. I just meant that it's not germaine to the
question of market acceptance. More is the pity.
Doc
Received on Mon Sep 09 2002 - 14:20:00 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:38 BST