> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Jules Richardson
> Sent: 12 December 2003 22:07
> To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
> Subject: OT: Email header question
>
> that he receives from anyone else. Maybe someone can have a look at the
> header on this message and see if there's anything obviously missing (it
> looks fine to me)
Looks fine from Outlook 2000, but then again it would. Your version of
Evolution (1.2.2) is much more updated than mine on the webserver, but I
suspect I'd get no problems there either.
> FYI, a reply from him showed the following info about his client:
>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
*bites tongue*
mmmmmf
> problem with his client, if he'd been getting the same font problem
> elsewhere, but it seems like his version of Outlook doesn't like mail
> sent by Evolution for some reason...
*tries to resist OE comment*
*fails*
Bollocks to it - OE is broken and one of the biggest wastes of ones and
zeros ever to grace this planet after 'doze versions 1, 2 and 3. Oh, and ME,
which should never have existed, ever.
Out of all the flamewars I read on USENET most of 'em are either from or
directed to OE users who think it's a USENET client AND a mail program AND a
virus transfer agent. It does too many things by default that no self
respecting mail client should, ie the 'preview pane' with FULL (micro$oft)
HTML support, automatic decoding/opening of attachments etc, and before the
OE supporters start jumping down my neck I KNOW these things can be turned
off or disabled, mostly, but the vast majority OE users wouldn't know where
to look or what to do.
*successfully bites tongue about web pages created with frontpage express*
cheers
--
adrian/witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(
Received on Fri Dec 12 2003 - 16:52:00 GMT