>> Just being a PDT-11/150 qualifies them as 'L_at__at_K, R_at_RE' :^) Having the
>> EIS/FIS chip should qualify them as 'L_at__at_K, ULTR@ R_at_RE'.
>
>Hmm, how would you qualify a CIS chip then?
I don't believe that there ever was a CIS chip for the 11/03,02
chipset. There was one for the 11/23[+]...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: mbg at world.std.com |
| | |
| "this space | (s/ at /_at_/) |
| unavoidably left blank" | URL:
http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Received on Tue Jan 07 2003 - 09:25:00 GMT