Quothe Erik S. Klein, from writings of Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:48:52AM -0700:
> who have switched (most of whom seem unqualified to monitor their own
> shoelaces) have had no impact on their market share. It has stayed
> virtually unchanged. The only think keeping the company alive is that
> the pool of Apple users spends more per capita then the pool of PC
> users.
>
> This is just my opinion, but that's not a sustainable business model. .
Why not? Who says that businesses have to expand? All of this
foolishness about an economy based on constant growth (greed) is
ruining this nation, our quality of life, and the world. The problem
is the businesses that can't survive without constant growth, they're
the poorly run ones. More growth needs more people (more
overpopulation), more houses, more highways, more schools, etc., which
all, in turn, require more growing companies and sources or goverment
revenue to keep the lunacy growing. A dangerous cycle. Stable
companies and a stable zero-growth based economy would surely be a
better business model, but one can't expect most monkey-brained
biz'droids, politicians, or most people, whose minds are rotting from
immersion in dogma and propaganda, to understand something so sensible
and simple.
Of course, I'm not saying that Apple isn't making any big mistakes...
--
Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals:
All Rights Reserved an unnatural belief that we're above Nature &
rdd_at_rddavis.org 410-744-4900 her other creatures, using dogma to justify such
http://www.rddavis.org beliefs and to justify much human cruelty.
Received on Fri Jul 18 2003 - 18:57:00 BST