Let me make this REAL clear. I've had both DOS 1.0 and 1.1 and they were
identical except for different disks and a paper sticker on the package
that said "DOS 1.1". I'm also fairly sure that there was no other mention
of hte DOs version anywhere else in the package except of the disks
themselves. I specificly checked the part number printed on the packages
and they were exactly the same. I didn't go through EVERY page in the
manual but the 20 or so pages that I checked, including the title page,
indexs, introduction, copyright, etc, were all exactly the same. I'm not
100% sure but I don't think either of them mentioned MS. I did see a LATER
DOs 1.1 package that had CHANGE pages added to it that was slightly
different. I don't remember if it had the same part number and paper
sticker or not.
Joe
At 02:09 PM 7/23/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Joe, Not so. The DOS 1.0 manual has no reference to Microsoft. The first
>page of the manual of DOS 1.1 states Disk Operation System, by Microsoft.
>The DOS 1.0 just states Disk Operation System. The part number is not the
>same either.
>
>Karl
>
>
>
>Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:00:22
>To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
>From: Joe <rigdonj_at_cfl.rr.com>
>Subject: Re: dos 1.0
>Reply-To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
>
>If you have a DOS 1.1 manual then you have a DOS 1.0 manual. I've had and
>seen several DOS 1.0 and 1.1 packages and the only difference between the
>manuals was that the DOS 1.1 manuals had a paper sticker on them that said
>"DOS 1.1". Even the part number on them was the same.
>
> Joe
>
>At 01:31 PM 7/22/03 -0500, you wrote:
>>I have DOS 1.1, in fact I have ALL of the IBM/PC DOS versions but for a
>>complete 1.0.
>>
>>Karl
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Received on Wed Jul 23 2003 - 15:05:55 BST