Restoration: how far should it go??

From: Jim Davis <jpdavis_at_gorge.net>
Date: Sun Jun 15 02:18:00 2003

Eric Smith wrote:

>"jamesd" <jdickens_at_ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>
>>I see you have higher standards than IBM, for a while after the AT was
>>released they sold ram that was two chips piggy backed so they could get
>>more
>>ram on the board.
>>
>>
><snip>
>
>Both the CLCC on substrate and the factory-stacked DIPs were actually
>quite reliable. Until ZIPs, SIPPs, and DIMMs were invented, that was
>the highest packaging density in common usage for RAM.
>
>
>
I thought one DIP had an inverted CS, Though I might be wrong. I did the
stacked thing on my atari 400,
Stacked 8K chips to get 16K. But that was in 82 and the atari H/W
manuals are in the garage.
Jim Davis.
Received on Sun Jun 15 2003 - 02:18:00 BST