Posting propagation delays

From: Witchy <witchy_at_binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
Date: Fri Oct 10 13:48:12 2003

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctech-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctech-bounces_at_classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Pete Turnbull
> Sent: 10 October 2003 06:10
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Posting propagation delays
>
>
> On Oct 9, 22:24, John Lawson wrote:
> >
> > I am moderately curious why it is taking one to five (or more)
> hours for
> > posts to show up... manual moderation perhaps? If so, I don't envy
> Jay
> > for the task...
> >
> > But other than that... more than one person I know is experiencing
> > these lengthy delays between 'send' and 'recieved'..
>
> When did you post this one? The headers show when it passe through
> each MTA along the way (in reverse order):
>

I've only just received this one and it's now 19:43 GMT on the 10th!
Here are the headers with email addresses munged:

Return-path: <cctech-bounces_at_classiccmp.org>
Received: from punt-3.mail.demon.net by mailstore
        for witchy_at_######.demon.co.uk id 1A7ys2-0005bK-8o;
        Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:36:58 +0000
Received: from [213.161.76.87] (helo=neptune.easily.co.uk)
        by punt-3.mail.demon.net with esmtp id 1A7ys2-0005bK-8o
        for witchy_at_######.demon.co.uk; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:07:58 +0000
Received: from huey.classiccmp.org (huey.classiccmp.org [209.145.140.36])
        by neptune.easily.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC539AA3
        for <cctech_at_###############.co.uk>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:07:47 +0100 (BST)
Received: from huey.classiccmp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by huey.classiccmp.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9AF8nH6059804;
        Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:08:49 -0500 (CDT)
        (envelope-from cctech-bounces_at_classiccmp.org)
Received: from he302war.uk.vianw.net (he302war.uk.vianw.net
[195.102.244.165])
        by huey.classiccmp.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9A5T1H3056839
        for <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:29:02 -0500 (CDT)
        (envelope-from pete_at_##########.u-net.com)
Received: from [62.172.27.116] (helo=mindy.dunnington.u-net.com)
        by he302war.uk.vianw.net with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #5)
        id 1A7pk1-0003IQ-00
        for cctalk_at_classiccmp.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 06:23:05 +0100
Received: (from pete_at_localhost)
        by mindy.dunnington.u-net.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/PNT2.0)
        id h9A5AKjM023986
        for cctalk_at_classiccmp.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 06:10:20 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 06:10:20 +0100 (BST)
From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_##########.u-net.com>
Message-Id: <10310100610.ZM23984_at_mindy.dunnington.u-net.com>
In-Reply-To: John Lawson <jpl15_at_#####.com>
        "Posting propagation delays" (Oct 9, 22:24)
References: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0310092221400.7191_at_panix2.panix.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:37:55 -0500
Cc:
Subject: Re: Posting propagation delays
X-BeenThere: cctech_at_classiccmp.org
Received on Fri Oct 10 2003 - 13:48:12 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:23 BST