Available: DEC LA120 printer

From: Ashley Carder <wacarder_at_usit.net>
Date: Thu Apr 22 15:16:12 2004

Some of us use modern computers and technologies (yes, even Microsoft
technologies),
as well as keeping hold of, preserving, and maintaining an interest in past
technologies.
I use outlook at my company that endorses Microsoft, I use Lotus Notes at
another
company that prefers Lotus, I use html based email on the road or when I'm a
random
computer in a library or somewhere else that is connected to the internet.
I don't even have a
text-based email client up and running right now, although I might have one
set up
in the near future just for show-and-tell if I get a PDP-11/34 up and
running and
connected to the internet.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Sokolov" <msokolov_at_ivan.harhan.org>
To: <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: Available: DEC LA120 printer


> > From: "Antonio Carlini" <arcarlini_at_iee.org>
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
> > X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>
> > > All Rights Reserved | My VAX | an unnatural belief that we're
> > > above Nature &
> > > www.rddavis.org | runs VMS & | her other creatures, using
> > > dogma to justify such 410-744-4900 | doesn't crash!| beliefs
> > > and to justify much human cruelty.
> >
> > Fractures sigs too :-)
>
> No, Antonio, it's your fucking shitty M$ Outcrook that fractures sigs.
> RDD's sig looks the way it's supposed to on my VT320 using a standard text
mail
> program that doesn't stick its nose where it doesn't belong distorting
ARPA
> Internet text mail messages.
>
> MS
>
> P.S. Sorry everyone for blowing my safety valve, and in particular no
offense
> intended to Antonio, you've done some incredibly wonderful things, but it
just
> pisses me off to no end when a presumed Classic computist uses M$ Outcrook
for
> ClassicCmp mail rather than a proper text mail client on a text terminal.
Received on Thu Apr 22 2004 - 15:16:12 BST