Hollerith (was: lk401 keyboard protocol?

From: David V. Corbin <dvcorbin_at_optonline.net>
Date: Mon Feb 23 18:15:48 2004

 To those who (correctly) posted that I was off by 4 (16) years, you are all
100% correct. Mia Culpa.



>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
>>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fred Cisin
>>> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 1:29 PM
>>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>>> Subject: RE: Hollerith (was: lk401 keyboard protocol?
>>>
>>> Well, ...
>>> not "Exactly!", since he was born in 1860, therefore it
>>> would be 35, not
>>> 39 (NB: 1900 was NOT a leap year)
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, David V. Corbin wrote:
>>>
>>> > Exactly!
>>> >
>>> > >>> -----Original Message-----
>>> > >>> From: cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
>>> > >>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
>>> > >>> blstuart_at_bellsouth.net
>>> > >>> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 11:11 PM
>>> > >>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>>> > >>> Subject: Re: Hollerith (was: lk401 keyboard protocol?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> >> > > 39th? Shouldn't it be older than that?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Methinks ol' Herman must have been born on February 29, 1848.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Brian L. Stuart
Received on Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:15:48 GMT