Should have been worded as follows:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashley Carder" <wacarder_at_usit.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: RSTS/E and PDP 11/23
> Paul, you probably know the answer to this.
>
> I've seen this site before and wondered where the line is
> that separates fact from fiction. Somewhere around 1990,
> obviously, but the line has been craftily blurred by the author
> of this 100th birthday thing. I have done studied my
*** "I have NOT studied my"
> DEC / RSTS / PDP-11 history enough to pick out anything
> that is fictitious prior to stuff in the early 90s. Is everything
> up to 1990 fact?
>
> Ashley
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Koning" <pkoning_at_equallogic.com>
> To: <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:53 PM
> Subject: Re: RSTS/E and PDP 11/23
>
>
> > >>>>> "bill" == bill bailey <beclassic_at_att.net> writes:
> >
> > bill> Here's one person's notes: 1983 April-RSTS/E Version
> > bill> 8.0-06. Support for the recently announced PDP Micro 11/23
> > bill> system (RD51 10 megabyte disk, 2*RX50 400K byte floppies, 128K
> > bill> words memory).
> >
> > bill> http://www.silverware.co.uk/rsts_80th_birthday.htm
> >
> > Oh my goodness... that takes me back... (I thought it was a 100th
> > birthday article -- but in any case, that article or one very much
> > like it was presented at the RSTS 20th birthday celebration at New
> > Orleans DECUS.)
> >
> > Thanks Bill!
> >
> > paul
> >
>
Received on Mon May 17 2004 - 14:10:54 BST